<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How is The Enquirer Framing The Layoffs? UPDATED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/</link>
	<description>Not Really Above Namecalling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:53:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Ed</title>
		<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecincinnatiman.com/?p=1858#comment-218</guid>
		<description>My guess is that it&#039;s less shock than it is outrage.  Newspapers were the only game in town for a long, long time and simply didn&#039;t bother to learn how to keep up.  As a result, the big paper overlords (i.e., Gannett and Scripps) are more or less at their knees.  Now, I don&#039;t know how direct this result is, per se, but it definitely looms.  The more our paper cuts things away to &quot;streamline,&quot; the sooner they&#039;re going to just cut everything away and disappear.  Or become completely irrelevant.  I&#039;m not certain which is worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that it&#8217;s less shock than it is outrage.  Newspapers were the only game in town for a long, long time and simply didn&#8217;t bother to learn how to keep up.  As a result, the big paper overlords (i.e., Gannett and Scripps) are more or less at their knees.  Now, I don&#8217;t know how direct this result is, per se, but it definitely looms.  The more our paper cuts things away to &#8220;streamline,&#8221; the sooner they&#8217;re going to just cut everything away and disappear.  Or become completely irrelevant.  I&#8217;m not certain which is worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob estes</title>
		<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>bob estes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecincinnatiman.com/?p=1858#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Why is it that newspaper people seem to act with absolute shock that they&#039;d be laid off? News flash: people are getting laid off all over this country, and it&#039;s a course of business to lay people off. I&#039;ve been laid off twice in my career now - it&#039;s as normal as a pay raise, sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that newspaper people seem to act with absolute shock that they&#8217;d be laid off? News flash: people are getting laid off all over this country, and it&#8217;s a course of business to lay people off. I&#8217;ve been laid off twice in my career now &#8211; it&#8217;s as normal as a pay raise, sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCH</title>
		<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>FCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecincinnatiman.com/?p=1858#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I like the comment on the Enquirer site this morning, observing that the ENQ deleted the story that ran yesterday, relaunching it today as new.  Yesterday&#039;s reader comments ranged from insightful to furious -- check them out here:  http://tinyurl.com/klsun7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the comment on the Enquirer site this morning, observing that the ENQ deleted the story that ran yesterday, relaunching it today as new.  Yesterday&#8217;s reader comments ranged from insightful to furious &#8212; check them out here:  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/klsun7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/klsun7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonB</title>
		<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecincinnatiman.com/?p=1858#comment-215</guid>
		<description>YET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ed</title>
		<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecincinnatiman.com/?p=1858#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, we can&#039;t pay them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, we can&#8217;t pay them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Crout</title>
		<link>http://thecincinnatiman.com/2009/07/how-is-the-enquirer-framing-the-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Crout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecincinnatiman.com/?p=1858#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Just think, there&#039;s a pool of angry talent walking the streets now, looking for somewhere to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just think, there&#8217;s a pool of angry talent walking the streets now, looking for somewhere to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
